Madness dictated

Hello this is John I would like to tell you all about Erin the most lovely girl in the world

and what do you have to say always that's all you have to say anything else would like anything else okay and really 

now getting to the point where she can crawl a little bit and also grab things and bang on them and those sorts of things today My Keyboard Is Broke One Them and Exalt I Thought It Was Very Fun. 

Also Is but Perhaps It Was Not Quite Funny the Things I and Many Phone Is Ringing I Well Erin the Thing Speaks That Was Doing Quite Well but It Seems to Have Gone

 Very I All Of A Sudden but Who Flees Excuse My This Please Excuse My Rudeness but Why Don't You Go Eat at Three

 and and and UW Three: and Two and Three Be Be Some and Hasn't Been Seen in and in and 

Why the Pain in Her Would Be That Maybe She Might Some Things the the You Want to Eat My Shoe Think the You Want to Buy Some They I You Can Eat Much but You Might Wanthim and business will not dim frustrating

I don't want to open anything use piece of shipped that's right never open anything you stupid piece

more fabulous machine poetry after the break...

Ipad synthesis

I love me some synthesizers. I've been into synths on computers since the late nineties. It has been really interesting to follow the development of software synths over this time, and I have recently been looking at the synths available on the ipad.

From my experience the ipad can offer a number of advantages over a traditional Mac or PC.

On the ipad controls are much more immediate than those available on a PC. While PCs do have peripherals like keyboards and boxes with knobs, the ipad has the potential for easier, more intuitive controls.
For instance, with a PC, if you want to turn a knob you need to click it and move it, or assign it to a knob and then spin that knob. Potentially on the ipad you could turn as many knobs as the number of fingers you can fit on the screen.. In the real world it can be hard to do usefully adjust more than two knobs at once. But let me see you try to adjust five real physical knobs at once, I can do it easily on the ipad.

This is pretty obvious: the ipad is more portable than a PC. Well if you like fiddling with synths and making crazy sounds then that is great because you can take the synth wherever you go, and if you're watching TV you can fiddle around during commercials

How to do nothing

you can convince yourself to do nothing at all if you are looking at the negatives of everything...

Ebooks, giving power to the people.

So, just had some thoughts about what Mike Shatzkin had to say on The Kindle chronicles recently.

Mr Shatzkin stated "It's hard to see what's not there" in reference to his argument that things like Steve Jobs or Washington or Lincoln biographies would go away in a world without big publishing companies to finance long term writing projects.

"It's hard to see what's not there" is not an argument in favor of the publishers, since the case for stuff that's not there is every bit as strong with big publishing companies standing in the way of progress and publishing books with controversial or unpopular ideas. 

Also... I don't see his argument about the Steve Jobs biography, it has made so much money and sold so many copies. I don't know how something of that kind would be published in the future, but the sales are so high that I think someone will find a way. I don't think it is the popular ideas that need protection, because they will always find a way.

Kickstarter has been running for a few years now, and many authors have the money to write and publish books that way. That's the problem with a free market, we don't really know what's going to happen in the future, but I would say that any kind of book that is published now and makes money is going to be published in the future because it makes money, and people in the future will be every bit as interested in making money as people are today.

Mr Shatzkin failed to make the case that on the podcast that ebooks will be forced to drop below $9.99, so until I know what case he makes for that I don't really know how to respond to his insistence that high profile books and authors would be selling books for $6.99-$5.99 and driving beginning authors out.

He also said that the new e-publishing paradigm would be hard to break into for new authors... this is true, but it has always been hard. Some authors will find success that wouldn't have before and some authors probably won't. but if Stephen King can sell millions of books, but wouldn't have been able to without marketing and support, then there will always be a place for people or companies that can offer support to authors who will potentially sell millions of books. 

I don't think these future entities will hold the power that publishing companies have traditionally held, they will be partners to authors not masters

Stealing stories. if it was good enough for Shakespeare then it's good enough for me.

in ancient Greece the plays written by the great masters were all just their own version of the same story, told in their own way.
Most of Shakespeare's stories were around before he made them his own.
Like Romeo and Juliet "Its plot is based on an Italian tale, translated into verse as The Tragical History of Romeus and Juliet by Arthur Brooke in 1562 and retold in prose in Palace of Pleasure by William Painter in 1582. Shakespeare borrowed heavily from both but, to expand the plot, developed supporting characters, particularly Mercutio and Paris."


So in this day and age most people would look down on a writer who "merely" wrote their own version of a story, not to mention the legal action that would take place if the story was still under copyright. But what makes it a problem for a modern author to "steal" a story if the greatest writer in the English language stole virtually all of his stories?


There is certainly an aversion to being unoriginal, and most people feel they need to write everything from scratch or they aren't original. But what other than the author's creativity and imagination distinguishes "the lord of the rings" from a buddy-cop movie? 


I think the idea to be completely original impedes many writers who would otherwise be honing their craft. a blank piece of paper is a very tall wall to climb, and when you could write anything then you cannot in fact write anything. to quote Ayn Rand "if something can be anything, it is actually nothing; if you feel, “Now I can write anything,” you will write nothing. Only when you have some specific entity in mind—some germ of a plot—can you make something out of something and begin to build." (Art of Fiction, 43)
I think that people who give the advice to start with a blank page and just start writing even if you are just writing gibberish, are giving very bad advice indeed. What beginning writers need is what people learning any profession need. They need to learn good habits and starting writing from an idea is a good habit. if that means taking a story from some other source than your own imagination then that is ok. One cannot expect a person just starting out in pottery class to turn out a Ming vase, or a kid with a guitar to write "yesterday" when he first sits down with the instrument. But this is what we expect from writers and what many writers end up expecting from themselves.


You cannot be too proud to steal a story and work to make it your own, if it was good enough for Shakespeare then it's good enough for me.

Writing more is simple.

So if you listen to or frequent discussions of writing fiction you've probably heard people talk about outlining versus not outlining. For years I have been confused about this point. Let me relate my experience and perhaps it will make some sense. So several years ago I was out walking, and this was at a time that I was carrying around a notepad to jot down ideas. Well I had an idea about a play focusing on a vain and self important count. The idea came out pretty well formed and I wrote down a. Basic outline of the various scenes of the play. The next day I started writing the play on a computer we had that did not have Internet access and was finished within a month. It seemed that writing from an outline was therefore the best way to write. Everything had gone so smoothly, the play spilled out quickly, I had little writers block, and the finished product was pretty decent. Over the last decade I have taken that to mean that I ought to be writing an outline when I write something, and have been struggling with it. At various times I will have some inspiration And write an entire play or short story from that inspiration, but then I've tried writing from an outline, first I would write the outline and then try to write from that outline. Writing from an outline in this fashion produced very stiff and uninteresting writing, and what's more is that the writing was very hard, like pushing against a brick wall in my mind. So of course I decided that I must be the kind of writer that writes from inspiration. Waiting for inspiration is a tricky thing because it is so frequently hard to find. Inspiration also does not come to those who are not prepared. If if you aren't writing then you are not really prepared for inspiration, and if you must haves inspiration to write then you won't be writing. It's a good way to get bogged down and spend years not writing very much even though you sincerely want to. In the last two days I have written 1,394 words and 2,100 words on a story that I started sometime in 1997. I have tried to write the story many times before with and without an outline and never got half as far. What has changed? Well i read a blogpost http://thisblogisaploy.blogspot.com/2011/06/how-i-went-from-writing-2000-words-day.html and another from the same blogger about her process for plotting a novel in 5 steps. What I realized is that I needed to know what I was going to write next. I had been approaching writing without knowing what I wanted to write. It was like I was building something without any particular plan or structure and so I would be looking at the smallest component a sentence in a scene and trying to decide what that sentence should look like without knowing if I was building a sports car or a nuclear submarine. It makes sense to me that I can write a one act play or a short story from inspiration because I can hold that whole structure and plan in my mind, but it's a much harder thing to hold all the particulars of a longer story in mind while writing. I can't help the feeling that I should have gotten this years ago. I guess that's just how life goes, anyway I can't turn back the clock. I was going to say something about Ayn Rand's book art of fiction because she talks about knowing things about what you a writing before you write, but she doesn't specifically apply it to the process of writing and whether and how to make outlines. Anyhow I think I've rambled enough, and exposed the fact that it is also good to have a plan before going into writing something as simple ass a blog post. I wrote this on an iPad, so any typos are the fault of Apple.

hello baby

hey there, I'm writing another blog post. Aren't you happy?
I thought I would see how well I can do this using a dictation program so that if I am carrying a baby I can still write something.
So far it seems as though it is doing okay job.

If you listen to podcasts you might listen to a show called I should be writing, recently the host of the show was doing an interview and they had a little tip for giving your ending a little bit of Interest. What they suggested was coming up with 10 different endings to a story that your writing. I think that is some good advice because it can keep you from going with the most obvious and boring ending. It can also keep you from becoming stuck on just one ending or becoming stuck on an ending that is not as good as it should be.

So what are you think so far? Other than a few mistakes, like in the last sentence, the program is doing an okay job of understanding what I am saying.

blogging is for suckers!

So...
there's not a lot going on lately, but I am making a blog post.

The blog post is thanks to a recommendation from the voluntary life podcast about checking out the "getting things done" book and system. The central benefit of the system is getting things out of your head so that you can concentrate on doing the thing you're doing.
I've been going through the first parts of implementing the system and it seems that so far it has been beneficial. So I'd totally recommend it.

In other news I'm starting on a novel. it is not a novel that I know anything about yet, I'm just saying that I'm starting on a novel because I'd like to just throw that out there as something that is "happening"

For any fans of Justin Bieber's shoes... Well I totally left that story hanging, but at some point I will figure out how it ends and then write the rest of the story. Justin may even make an appearance.

On a slightly related topic, why isn't there an exclusive unofficial Biebography that gives completely ridiculous counter-factual details of his life? That would be a remarkably fun and or whimsical book... I guess Abraham Lincoln would be better since he is less likely to sue you if you include details of that one episode of clubbing baby seals. Also faux-biographies of Lincoln are in vogue right now (or last year, I can't keep track).

Are faux-biographies of Ben Franklin cool now or what? I mean not that you'd need to spice up a Ben Franklin bio. I mean he's a man that got around; ladies loved cool Ben F.

Improve in another language the hard and laborious way.

So you want to learn a new language?

Boy do I have the thing for you! That's right! Start with my method and you too can speak a new language in ten to twenty years!

Step Zero: Get your learning template from years of public schooling, and "learn" how to learn a language from a few years of Spanish french or German in high school.

Step One: find some phrase books or first year books with some phrases in them. Try to practice saying these phrases to yourself.

Step Two: Get busy and forget about learning the language for a year or two.

Step Three: Get very serious about the language again after watching a special on the Travel channel. Get a few grammar books and some more advanced textbooks because "you've already learned the easy stuff."

Step Four: Burn out after a few months or weeks.

Step Six: Buy some expensive software or audio CD collection as a way to show yourself that you are really serious about learning this language. Start using them and really feel like you are making progress.

Step Seven: find the software or CDs stuck in a closet or under a car seat and wonder why you are so bad at learning languages.

Step Eight: Travel to a country where people speak the language that you have been "learning". Order a meal and feel pleased with yourself. Then notice some other tourist having what appears to be a fluent conversation with a local and wonder why you've been wasting your time.

Step Nine: There is no step nine because you gave up on trying to learn a foreign language and settled for talking to people in English.

So class, what have we learned? Not a whole lot really except that I forgot the real first step and had to add it in later as step zero because I don't want to relabel every step. We also learned that we don't know how to learn a language.

The life and times of Chickens!

There is a lot of Chicken in the world, and some times the chickens are very happy.
Sometimes chickens end up dead and eaten by people.

Chickens are not generally very smart, if you kick them they won't know to run away from you and you can kick them again... particularly if you are playing a "Legend of Zelda" game.

and um some days you feel like a chicken, and some days you feel like... the car?

Well anyhow, today is a very nice day, rainy and rainy!